Manegy

The 2027 Non-Compete Ban in Australia: A Critical Prep Guide for HR and Employers

29 July 2026

HR

SHARE

The 2027 Non-Compete Ban in Australia: A Critical Prep Guide for HR and Employers

The Australian Government has announced its intention to ban non-compete clauses for most Australian employees, with the reform proposed to take effect from 2027. Legislation has not yet passed, and the precise design of the ban remains subject to further development. For employers that currently use non-compete clauses as part of their employment contracts, understanding what is proposed and what alternative protections remain available is a practical starting point.




What is Proposed Under the 2027 Australian Non-Compete Ban?


The Australian Government announced its intention to ban non-compete clauses for employees earning below the high-income threshold under the Fair Work Act. The threshold is indexed annually on 1 July — from 1 July 2026, it is set at $190,100. If implemented, the ban would cover the significant majority of Australian employees.


The reform is part of a broader package that also includes proposed restrictions on no-poach agreements between businesses and anti-competitive wage-fixing arrangements. Treasury released a Consultation Paper in July 2025. The design of the reforms — including how the ban would apply to existing contracts, what exceptions would apply, and how it would be enforced — remains subject to further consultation and legislation.




What employers can still use to protect business interests


Non-compete clauses are one of several tools employers use to protect confidential information, client relationships, and intellectual property after an employee leaves. The proposed ban would not affect the availability of other protective mechanisms, which are expected to remain in place regardless of the reform's outcome.

Protection Tool

What It Safeguards

Proposed 2027 Reform Status

Confidentiality Agreements

Sensitive business data & trade secrets

No impact (Fully active)

IP Assignment Clauses

Intellectual property created by staff

No impact (Fully active)

Non-Solicitation Clauses

Poaching of clients or remaining staff

Under scrutiny (Final rules pending)

Garden Leave & Notice Periods

Immediate competitive impact during departure

No impact (Highly recommended buffer)




The proposed ban is not yet law, and the final shape of the reform — including how it applies to existing contracts and what exceptions will be available — will only be confirmed once legislation passes Parliament. Employers do not need to act immediately, but those who use non-compete clauses as a standard feature of employment contracts have time to assess their position and consider what alternative protections may be appropriate for their circumstances.


For specific advice on existing contracts, post-employment restraints, or the implications of the proposed reform for a particular business, consult a workplace relations or employment lawyer.


Official sources:




Last updated: July 2026



SHARE

Latest

Technology

CDR for Non-Bank Lenders: Navigating 2026 Data Holder Obligations

Australia's Consumer Data Right (CDR) has expanded beyond banking and energy, with non-bank lenders having commenced pro...

CDR for Non-Bank Lenders: Navigating 2026 Data Holder Obligations
HR

Section 65A Compliance Guide 2026: How FWC Precedents Define 'Reasonable Business Grounds' for Refusing Working From Home (WFH) Requests

Under the National Employment Standards (NES) set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), eligible Australian employees hav...

Section 65A Compliance Guide 2026: How FWC Precedents Define 'Reasonable Business Grounds' for Refusing Working From Home (WFH) Requests
Finance & Accounting

Q1 BAS Deadline (28 Oct): How to Avoid ATO Data-Matching Flags

With the 28 October Q1 BAS deadline approaching, Australian finance teams face heightened ATO scrutiny. Under the expand...

Q1 BAS Deadline (28 Oct): How to Avoid ATO Data-Matching Flags
Technology

Australia's 2026 SBOM Minimum Elements: Guide for IT Procurement & Cyber Security Teams

On 30 July 2026, the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC), alongside international authorities including the U.S. Cyb...

Australia's 2026 SBOM Minimum Elements: Guide for IT Procurement & Cyber Security Teams
HR

Employee Choice Pathway 2026: Casual Conversion Checklist & Lessons from Baker v Macquarie University

The Fair Work Commission's landmark Gregory Baker v Macquarie University [2026] FWC 3054 decision has fundamentally chan...

Employee Choice Pathway 2026: Casual Conversion Checklist & Lessons from Baker v Macquarie University
advertisement